Argumentation Mining in Persuasive Essays and Scientific Articles from the Discourse Structure Perspective
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we analyze and discuss approaches to argumentation mining from the discourse structure perspective. We chose persuasive essays and scientific articles as our example domains. By analyzing several example arguments and providing an overview of previous work on argumentation mining, we derive important tasks that are currently not addressed by existing argumentation mining systems, most importantly, the identification of argumentation structures. We discuss the relation of this task to automated discourse analysis and describe preliminary results of two annotation studies focusing on the annotation of argumentation structure. Based on our findings, we derive three challenges for encouraging future research on argumentation mining.
منابع مشابه
An Attempt to Combine Features in Classifying Argument Components in Persuasive Essays
So far, several approaches have been done in detecting and classifying argumentation in persuasive essays. In this paper, we proposed some new features on top of the state-of-the-art researches in argumentation mining. We grouped 68 features into 8 categories; they are structural, lexical, indicators, contextual, syntactic, prompt similarity, word embedding, and discourse features. Instead of h...
متن کاملCoarse-grained Argumentation Features for Scoring Persuasive Essays
Scoring the quality of persuasive essays is an important goal of discourse analysis, addressed most recently with highlevel persuasion-related features such as thesis clarity, or opinions and their targets. We investigate whether argumentation features derived from a coarse-grained argumentative structure of essays can help predict essays scores. We introduce a set of argumentation features rel...
متن کاملUsing Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays
Argument mining aims to determine the argumentative structure of texts. Although it is said to be crucial for future applications such as writing support systems, the benefit of its output has rarely been evaluated. This paper puts the analysis of the output into the focus. In particular, we investigate to what extent the mined structure can be leveraged to assess the argumentation quality of p...
متن کاملIdentifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays
In this paper, we present a novel approach for identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. The structure of argumentation consists of several components (i.e. claims and premises) that are connected with argumentative relations. We consider this task in two consecutive steps. First, we identify the components of arguments using multiclass classification. Second, we clas...
متن کاملArgument Mining for Improving the Automated Scoring of Persuasive Essays
End-to-end argument mining has enabled the development of new automated essay scoring (AES) systems that use argumentative features (e.g., number of claims, number of support relations) in addition to traditional legacy features (e.g., grammar, discourse structure) when scoring persuasive essays. While prior research has proposed different argumentative features as well as empirically demonstra...
متن کامل